Features

Intellectual Property Protection

Joint Development Agreements can protect outsourced IP

Intellectual Property Protection



Joint Development Agreements can protect outsourced IP



By John Avellanet



With the rise in outsourcing new drug and biologic development to overseas laboratories, how are biopharmaceutical executives protecting their intellectual property (IP) from insider theft?

Drug and biotech co-development projects are increasingly common as firms seek to increase their product pipelines and speed time to market. Smaller firms are at a distinct dis-advantage when it comes to negotiating agreements that protect their current intellectual property and their long-term creative potential.

Outside of the FDA regulated marketplace, one successful strategy to place co-development partners on equal footing and protect both partners’ IP has been the creation of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA). Such a document can be created either during the initial negotiations or as a follow-on guiding set of principles incorporated as a contract amendment.

Intellectual Property Ownership



If the contract between product development organizations does not specify ownership rights of various components of intellectual property, the JDA is the place to summarize these. There are three areas of IP ownership the joint development agreement must specify:

  • Initial IP brought to the collaboration by each partner;
  • Ownership of the new IP that results from the partnership; and
  • Rules for negotiation around any IP outgrowths that are not necessarily part of the partnership’s goals, but that develop as natural offshoots of the partnership’s work.

As a best practice, one should consider creating an IP factsheet as an addendum to the JDA that reviews the basic types of intellectual property as well as the essentials of IP ownership and rights.

Even if the partnership contract specifies some components of IP ownership, consider using the JDA to further elaborate on ambiguous points. In such a case, the goal is to ensure that the scientists and engineers involved clearly understand the expectations of their executive teams.

Knowledge Flow Management



The flow of information and knowledge between collaborating organizations is one of the main thrusts of a joint development agreement.

Key components to address include: communication, issue resolution, project reviews and stage gate responsibilities, roles of each team member, checkpoints to ensure tangents are minimized yet still allowed, storage of information and security protocols. The goal of such efforts is to ensure that information exchanges and decision-making expectations are aligned among the collaborating organizations.

IP Storage and Security



To achieve this, involve personnel from records management and information technology groups. Records management must clarify the appropriate records retention rules around information generated during the co-development project and may need to bring in legal counsel to provide advice on certain aspects to minimize risk and liability in the worst-case event of future litigation and information discovery motions.

Information technology (IT) professionals will be required to understand the necessary levels of security expected and provide recommendations. Consider having the project manager or other non-IT executive approve the various levels of electronic security; leaving the security of developing intellectual property in the hands of your computer department risks an imbalance of security versus access.

I frequently advise my clients to avoid situations wherein five or more individuals who are in constant contact with each other have the exact same levels of access to IP. Drawing on historical patterns seen in financial fraud, five is the trigger number of people required for theft of IP without alarm bells sounding until it is too late.

Without careful consideration of options and techniques, the five-person trigger point may seem an unnecessary burden by project managers and information technology personnel. Consider asking your outside counsel, an independent consultant or even your alliance partner for help in implementing this control.

Place all joint project documents, schedules, meeting summaries and so forth in a central repository where they become the property of all parties involved in the collaboration. Note that storing the information in a central location does not imply across-the-board access.

Many of the documents in the repository will be “read-only” (or may not even be visible), depending upon each individual’s role within the collaboration. In addition, have the information technology department of each organization provide a regular electronic back-up, as well as periodic snapshots of the repository for long-term archival. This will provide each partner protection and proof for its claims of intellectual property ownership and project effort.

Final Thoughts



While the joint development agreement is not a legally binding document until it is made into a contract amendment or otherwise incorporated contractually, the JDA is a set of operating principles and guidelines agreed upon between the collaborating organizations’ executives and project teams.

Review the JDA on an annual basis. Ask yourself the following questions:

  • Are the controls still working as intended?
  • Are there any further areas of work undertaken together that need to be incorporated into the JDA?
  • Are there new intellectual property aspects that need to be captured?
  • Have all team members and senior executives reviewed the agreement?
  • Do they understand their roles and accountabilities?

If executives are uncomfortable asking these questions, recognize this as a warning flag. Consider bringing in an outside facilitator to help with an unbiased review and set of recommendations.

John Avellanet is a private consultant to biopharmaceutical and medical device executives on cost-effective regulatory compliance, quality by design and intellectual property security. He can be reached through his independent consultancy, Cerulean Associates LLC. This article was adapted from SMARTERCOMPLIANCE™, a monthly executive newsletter published by Cerulean Associates LLC, from Mr. Avellanet’s “Trade Secrets” column, and from his chapter, “Securing Intellectual Property from the Inside Out,” in the new book Best Practices in Biotechnology Business Development.

Keep Up With Our Content. Subscribe To Contract Pharma Newsletters